RE: update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Stenberg [mailto:daniel@haxx.se]
> Sent: 14 September 2001 09:15
> On 13 Sep 2001, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> > > (1) what did I change?
> > >
> > > (2) what is out of date?
> >
> > If we split 1 and 2 into two different subcommands, what would they be
> > called? Could their output still be similar?
>
> .... and it would still be neat to have _one_ command that shows
> a combined output, as discussed previously. It doesn't necessarily take
> away the need for two different ones of course, but could be an option
> or something.

I'd like to see 'status' and 'lstatus' (local status) or 'status -l'
(--local).
status would be 1 and 2 combined, lstatus would be just 1.

I think output could be similar.

My $0.02,

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006