cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> > Personally I'd prefer not to have to depend on MSVC for the Win32 port.
> > Maybe we should put that on the list of things to do for 1.0?
>
> +1, so long as we continue to support the MSVC build. It's really
> ridiculous to claim support for an OS when the only way to build on
> that OS is to mimic a different OS. If we can support cygwin builds
> while maintain the MSVC .dsp/.dsw deal-ios -- that's a Good Thing.
A highly desirable goal. I'm not sure we should hold up on calling
something "1.0" because we haven't met it, though.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:29 2006