[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [OT] commit methodology

From: Tripp Lilley <tlilley_at_perspex.com>
Date: 2001-03-30 05:31:00 CEST

On 29 Mar 2001, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> Tripp Lilley <tlilley@perspex.com> writes:
>
> > Actually, to satisfy my curiousity, could someone tell me if any of the
> > "core team" has significant experience with Perforce? I'm asking because
> > the general philosophy and "mental model" of Perforce is sufficiently
> > different from that of RCS, CVS, SourceSafe, MKS, and other "children of
> > RCS" that it seems a good idea to study it and mine it.
>
> None of us have used Perforce really, and SVN is attempting to
> (mostly) emulate CVS's model, at least in the user interface.
> However, because of the way our repository stores trees, a
> Perforce-using acquaintance of ours has told us that our
> "branches-are-just-subdirs" model is very similar to Perforce.

That's good to hear. I mean "branches-are-just-subdirs", not "emulate
CVS's model" :) When I have cycles (hah!), I'll peer more closely at svn
and see if it might not be possible to build a system that offers
Perforce's worldview. I suspect it -won't- be "compatible" with svn (as in
one can use the same repo in either "cvs-similar" mode or
"perforce-similar" mode), but that it could at least be built upon the
same core code (the svn filesystem, the WebDAV stuff, etc.)

Ah, another research project. Thanks, folks! ;)

-- 
   Joy-Loving * Tripp Lilley  *  http://stargate.eheart.sg505.net/~tlilley/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  "Fiber makes you poop." -- From <http://www.pvponline.com/bts_studio.php3>
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:26 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.