Branko =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=C8ibej?= <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > It remains the case that two different files (foo/xxx and
> > bar/xxx, if foo was copied to bar) might live in the same node. The
> > information about what happened should still be there if you look hard
> > enough.
> But this doesn't make sense to me at all. If I want a new branch, I'll
> use "svn branch". Copy should never create new branches, it's just
> semantically wrong. Either that, or I'm completely lost.
You're completely lost. :)
Subversion doesn't branch. Instead, you make a copy of your entire
source tree, and work there.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:21 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev