Re: The next step in a table driven client
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2000-11-15 07:46:59 CET
> I'd much rather see a hash table than One Big Mother Structure that
I vote for a big structure, because:
* It will catch typos when you use options. Using a hash
* C structure lookups are more concise than APR hash lookups.
* When you store an option, you need to check it against the
Sure, you keep having to add entries to the structure. So what?
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.