Re: Automated builds of Subversion et al. (was Re: somebody broke APR :-))

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_savonarola.red-bean.com>
Date: 2000-10-29 00:48:32 CEST

> I have a dedicated machine installed and firewalled, so I should get
> to this this weekend. If anybody has any particular features they
> want -- and in particular, any strong feelings about whether
> ``complain repeatedly until fixed'' or ``complain once when it breaks
> and then be silent until it's okay again'' is the right behavior --
> let me know.

How about "complain when the output from `make --silent' changes?"
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:13 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?"
Previous message: Matthew Braithwaite: "Automated builds of Subversion et al. (was Re: somebody broke APR :-))"
Maybe in reply to: Matthew Braithwaite: "Automated builds of Subversion et al. (was Re: somebody broke APR :-))"
Next in thread: Karl Fogel: "Re: Automated builds of Subversion et al. (was Re: somebody broke APR :-))"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]