Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:59:20PM +0200, Branko �ibej wrote:
>
> Have you tried `cvs -n update' ?

I had a feeling somebody was going to say ``oh, there's a way to do
that!'' I hadn't thought to look in the global options.

Still, I think that ``show the status of my working copy in the cvs
update output format'' is important enough to be the default behavior
for some command -- possibly, but not necessarily, `svn status'. I'm
certainly happy that it's available as a non-default behavior for `cvs
update', but I think it's more useful than that relative obscurity
suggests.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:12 2006