Re: [PATCH] add pool pointer to svn_string_t

> IMO, we should switch to passing "const char *" more often.

Assuming we are careful to also pass an associated length when
necessary, sure. (I don't think it's necessary in most of the places
where we pass strings.)

> Where we need the buffering features of svn_string, we should use a
> new svn_buffer type (stripped down from today's svn_string).

What would you strip out of svn_string_t? There isn't much there.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:10 2006