Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> There is currently a dependency loop between libsvn_string and libsvn_subr
> (within the linking of the tests).
> [ and yah: the loop is generally my fault because I added the
> svn_pool_create in svn_tests_main.c ]
>
> Per my earlier request, I'd like to simply fold libsvn_string into
> libsvn_subr. I can easily do the "cvs add" to shift the thing over and
> whatnot. The big question is whether people would prefer an "mv" at the
> repository level to keep the history on svn_string.c and tests/stringtest.c.
> Personally, I'm okay with a reference to the prior location (e.g. "this was
> copied from libsvn_string/svn_string.c; go there for prior history").
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Votes?
> Option 1) just go with a "cvs add"
> Option 2) "mv" in the CVS repository (and clear the tags)
I know Karl was planning to debug some transient problem by checking
out an old tree by date and debugging that. I doubt combining
libsvn_string and libsvn_subr would affect that --- functions could
get linked at different addresss; is that important? --- but it's
probably preferable to keep the tree reproduceable. I'd recommend
against mving anything in the repository.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:10 2006